British Government Wins Asylum Seekers’ Appeal
Previously, the High Court had mandated that 138 men staying at the Bell Hotel vacate the premises by September 12.
However, the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling, with Lord Justice Bean highlighting that the earlier decision contained “a number of errors that undermine his decision.”
In its appeal, the Home Office and the hotel argued that evicting the men could cause disruptions in the broader asylum accommodation system.
In delivering the judgment, Lord Justice Bean stated: “The judge’s approach ignores the obvious consequence that the closure of one site means capacity needs to be identified elsewhere in the system.”
He also noted that the High Court's injunction “may incentivize” other local authorities to take similar legal actions against asylum housing arrangements.
“The potential cumulative impact of such ad hoc applications was a material consideration … that was not considered by the judge,” he added.
This ruling ensures that the asylum seekers will continue to be housed at the Bell Hotel, easing immediate pressure on the Home Office's accommodation network.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
